On the Role of Trainable Parameters in Differentiable Feedback Delay Networks

Additional Results

The following results are provided as supplementary material for the article On the Role of Trainable Parameters in Differentiable Feedback Delay Networks, authored by R. Giampiccolo, A. I. Mezza, S. Koyama, M. Pezzoli, A. Bernardini, F. Antonacci, and A. Sarti, and presented at the 2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain, 4-8 Sept. 2026.



We performed the following tests to unveil the dependence of the FDN optimization on its parameters:



Test 1: shoebox room of 5.46 × 14.52 × 3.38 m (W x L x H), source placed in the origin, receiver placed at (−0.37, −0.92, 0) m.

Test 1
Test 1 - Errors on EDC, EDP, and EDR
Test 1
Test 1 - Pseudo-spectra.
Test 1
Test 1



Test 2: shoebox room of 5.46 × 14.52 × 3.38 m (W x L x H), source placed in the origin, receiver placed at (-0.51, −2.98, 0) m.

Test 2
Test 2 - Errors on EDC, EDP, and EDR
Test 2
Test 2 - Pseudo-spectra.
Test 2
Test 2



Test 3: shoebox room of 5.46 × 14.52 × 3.38 m (W x L x H), source placed in the origin, receiver placed at (1.12, −4.56, 0) m.

Test 3
Test 3 - Errors on EDC, EDP, and EDR
Test 3
Test 3 - Pseudo-spectra.
Test 3
Test 3



Test 4: shoebox room of 10 × 12 × 2.7 m (W x L x H), source placed in the origin, receiver placed at (1.19, -1.25, 0) m.

Test 3
Test 4 - Errors on EDC, EDP, and EDR
Test 3
Test 4 - Pseudo-spectra.
Test 3
Test 3





[1] R. Giampiccolo, A. I. Mezza, M. Pezzoli, S. Koyama, A. Bernardini, and F. Antonacci, “Modeling the Impulse Response of Higher-Order Microphone Arrays using Differentiable Feedback Delay Networks,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx25), Ancona, Italy, Sept. 2025, pp. 180–187.